Clarence Thomas Isn’t The Only One Ready To Reduce Women To Baby Incubators

If you happen to had been disturbed by “The Handmaid’s Story,” the dystopian story of a totalitarian regime that treats ladies as property and values them fully based mostly on their capability to provide infants, you must see what’s occurring in Congress proper now.

Previously week alone, Home Republicans have overwhelmingly voted towards a girl’s proper to journey for abortion care, to entry contraception and to marry somebody they love.

Every of those votes was appalling in its personal proper.

When the Home voted final week to make sure that ladies are in a position to journey throughout state traces for an abortion, 205 Republicans voted no. When the Home voted Tuesday to codify same-sex marriage, 157 Republicans voted no. On Thursday, when the Home voted to guard ladies’s proper to entry contraception and different contraception, 195 Republicans voted no.

Taken collectively, the broader message that Republicans are sending with these votes is much more horrifying: Ladies ought to be seen as little greater than child incubators.

The overwhelming majority of Home Republicans simply solid votes telling ladies they do not have a proper to marry somebody of the identical intercourse, they cannot have an abortion, they cannot journey to get one and so they cannot forestall pregnancies. Beneath his eye, am I proper, Margaret Atwood?

Tom Williams by way of Getty Photographs

Home Democratic leaders lined up votes on all of those payments in direct response to the Supreme Courtroom placing down Roe v. Wade final month, breaking from 50 years of precedent to disclaim ladies a constitutional proper to an abortion.

Republicans in Congress argued that none of those payments are mandatory as a result of the precise to contraception and the precise to same-sex marriage are protected.

“Under no circumstances, form or type is entry to contraception restricted or prone to being restricted,” Rep. Kat Cammack (R-Fla.) stated throughout Thursday’s debate on the contraception invoice. “The liberal majority is clearly making an attempt to stoke fears and mislead the American individuals as soon as once more as a result of of their minds stoking concern clearly is the one method that they will win.”

However that is the identical factor Republicans stated about Roe v. Wade. And there’s no cause to suppose the present crop of conservatives on the Supreme Courtroom ― all of whom are there due to their ties to the very anti-abortion and anti-LGBTQ authorized group, the Federalist Society ― received’t attempt to roll again extra of those protections. They’ve stated so themselves.

“In future circumstances, we should always rethink all of this Courtroom’s substantive due course of precedents, together with Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell,” Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in a concurring opinion when the courtroom overturned Roe v. Wade. He was referring to the rights acknowledged in Griswold (contraception), Lawrence (sexual conduct with a member of the identical intercourse) and Obergefell (same-sex marriage).

Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito beforehand referred to as for revisiting same-sex {couples}’ constitutional proper to marry, too. In October 2020, they stated the courtroom’s 2015 determination on marriage equality was “undemocratic” and that “the courtroom has created an issue that solely it will probably repair.”

Rep. Andy Kim (D-N.J.) stated Thursday that it’s not arduous to attach the dots between what the Supreme Courtroom simply did and what Republicans in Congress are making very clear they’d love to do in relation to legislating what ladies can and might’t do with their our bodies.

“When Clarence Thomas stated he needed to remove a girl’s proper to contraception, some informed me that’s simply his opinion,” Kim tweeted. “However now I noticed 195 of my Republican colleagues reject safety for contraceptives. This isn’t simply an opinion of 1 man. That is their plan.”

Even GOP Rep. Nancy Mace (S.C.), who opposes abortion rights and who celebrated when the Supreme Courtroom overturned Roe v. Wade, stated that barring ladies from gaining access to contraception is a step too far. She was one among simply eight GOP lawmakers who voted for the invoice guaranteeing a girl’s entry to contraception. That’s out of 211 Home Republicans.

Throughout the Home vote on that invoice, Mace wore a sign on her back that learn, “My state is banning EXCEPTIONS. Shield CONTRACEPTION.”

“My state is banning nearly all exceptions for girls together with who’ve been raped & victims of incest. At this time I voted to guard entry to contraceptives ― to guard each lady in South Carolina,” Mace tweeted. “You possibly can’t ban abortion after which not shield ladies’s entry to contraceptives.”

Regardless of so many Republicans voting towards these payments, all of them handed as a result of Democrats maintain the bulk. However there’s an excellent probability Republicans will win management of the Home in November. That might put Minority Chief Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) and Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) ― each of whom simply voted towards defending ladies’s rights to journey, to contraception, to abortion care ― answerable for setting the chamber’s agenda.

The place is the highest-ranked GOP lady within the Home, Republican Convention Chair Elise Stefanik (N.Y.), amid all of those votes aimed toward defending ladies’s rights? She simply launched a invoice barring the usage of federal {dollars} for medical transportation for girls going throughout state traces for abortion care.

In fact, even when Republicans win management of the Home within the midterms, they’d need to win management of the Senate, too, to manage all of Congress. And even in that state of affairs, Joe Biden will nonetheless be within the White Home till not less than 2024. Which means even a GOP-led Congress wouldn’t be capable of cross legal guidelines rolling again these sorts of protections for girls till a prepared Republican is within the White Home.

But when this week confirmed something, it’s that Clarence Thomas just isn’t an remoted case of a conservative able to strip basic protections from ladies in an effort to make them extra more likely to get pregnant, keep pregnant and make infants. It’s just about everybody within the Home Republican convention.

Source link

Related Articles

Back to top button