Final say on Quebec-Lévis tunnel will be ‘political decision,’ Legault insists

Conservative Chief Éric Duhaime says the tunnel is a waste of cash and is as a substitute calling for a bridge to attach the 2 cities.

Article content material

Coalition Avenir Québec Chief Francois Legault might have been campaigning in Longueuil on Monday, however he couldn’t escape a barrage of questions from reporters on a proposed tunnel for Quebec Metropolis.

Commercial 2

Article content material

The undertaking linking the provincial capital with Lévis is likely one of the main unfulfilled guarantees the CAQ made within the 2018 election — and the social gathering’s predominant adversary within the Quebec Metropolis area throughout this election marketing campaign gained’t let Legault neglect it.

Article content material

“Folks in Quebec Metropolis have been speaking about it for many years, we wish that bridge and (Legault) promised us that bridge 4 years in the past and he flip-flopped,” Conservative Chief Eric Duhaime instructed reporters Monday.

In a bid to woo Quebec Metropolis voters in 2018, Legault promised he would construct a “third hyperlink” throughout the St. Lawrence River — to enrich the Pierre Laporte Bridge and the Quebec Bridge — and have the “first shovel within the floor” earlier than the top of the CAQ’s first mandate in 2022. On the time, the CAQ mentioned the third hyperlink could possibly be a bridge or a tunnel.

Commercial 3

Article content material

Building has not began on a 3rd hyperlink, and Legault not too long ago admitted there aren’t any accomplished feasibility research on his new proposal to construct a tunnel connecting the 2 shores, although a research is within the works.

Legault mentioned the undertaking would go forward no matter what the research say, as a result of it’s a “political” determination. His feedback have been responding to Duhaime’s cost that Legault has “politicized” the transport ministry.

“There shall be a technical research, after which there shall be a political determination,” he mentioned. The research will “refine” the undertaking and extra precisely estimate the prices of the four-lane tunnel, presently estimated at $6.5 billion.

The CAQ chief mentioned he believes it’s “evident” and he’s satisfied the research will validate the undertaking. The research, he mentioned, will “have the ability to inform us the most effective methods to construct (the tunnel), how busy will probably be, and what components shall be for public transit and vehicles.”

Commercial 4

Article content material

Legault’s unique proposal for a six-lane, $10-billion tunnel was downsized to a four-lane tunnel with two of these lanes reserved for public transit throughout rush hours. He mentioned he would depart it to the research’ suggestions on learn how to divide the tunnel.

Duhaime has spent a big half of the present marketing campaign reminding voters in regards to the CAQ’s failure and accusing Legault of overlaying up research ordered by the earlier authorities on a 3rd hyperlink.

“It’s a very powerful undertaking ever within the Quebec Metropolis area,” Duhaime instructed reporters. “It’s necessary that the inhabitants, earlier than they vote, that they’ve all the knowledge readily available. Presently, there’s no transparency.”

Duhaime mentioned he filed an entry to info request with the Transport Division to acquire reviews and recommendation the federal government has acquired on the proposed crossing.

Commercial 5

Article content material

Legault is refusing to launch the research — he says they have been ordered beneath the Liberals and don’t apply to the brand new tunnel undertaking he’s proposing.

Duhaime mentioned the tunnel is a waste of cash and is as a substitute calling for a bridge connecting the jap a part of the 2 cities through Île-d’Orléans. The Conservative chief says a bridge could be cheaper and simpler to construct than a tunnel and would value between $3 billion and $5 billion, with much less threat of value overruns.

However Legault says a bridge would defile the bucolic panorama of the jap a part of the area together with Île-d’Orléans. A bridge, the incumbent premier instructed reporters in Longueuil, is “possible, nevertheless it’s not what we wish.”

Different opposition events mocked Legault’s leap to conclusions.

“François Legault is mocking info, reviews, science and Quebecers” by coming to conclusions earlier than the research are executed, mentioned Liberal Chief Dominique Anglade.

Parti Québécois Chief Paul St-Pierre Plamondon mentioned the assertion is an efficient instance of Legault placing the pursuits of the CAQ forward of the general public curiosity. “All of Quebec ought to ask the query: is that this what we wish for one more 4 years?”

Commercial 1


Postmedia is dedicated to sustaining a vigorous however civil discussion board for dialogue and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Feedback might take as much as an hour for moderation earlier than showing on the positioning. We ask you to maintain your feedback related and respectful. We have now enabled e mail notifications—you’ll now obtain an e mail in case you obtain a reply to your remark, there may be an replace to a remark thread you observe or if a person you observe feedback. Go to our Group Tips for extra info and particulars on learn how to regulate your e mail settings.

Source link

Related Articles

Back to top button