Thanks for the editor’s word instantly correcting claims made in a latest letter to the editor relating to testimony earlier than the Jan. 6 committee. The letter author should not have watched the hearings, in any other case he’d have heard what relating to Donald Trump’s declare ordering 10,000 Nationwide Guard troops for Jan.6, 2021.
I’m wondering the place the author bought his false concepts? Did he gullibly belief somebody who claimed to know what was sworn to in the course of the hearings? Isn’t democracy necessary sufficient to him that he would watch the hearings somewhat than rely upon second hand experiences?
Non-partisan CSPAN, in addition to CNN, MSNBC — however not Fox Information— carried and repeated in numerous time slots the whole public hearings. CSPAN, as at all times, had no commentary. CNN and MSNBC offered left, proper and heart commentary after every a part of the hearings. Fox reported little of the sworn testimony however let its opinion packages stir feelings with unsworn claims and misrepresentations. The place CSPAN, CNN and MSNBC centered on exhausting proof and sworn testimony, Fox propagandized. And irresponsible followers of Fox gullibly took its hosts at their phrase, resulting in the unfold of false info or outright lies precisely because the letter author offered.
Disgrace on the author and another citizen for being gullible. Disgrace for not evaluating exhausting proof and sworn testimony in opposition to mere claims and opinions. Our civic accountability is to use the abilities society supplied Ok-12, most particularly to political life we’re a part of whether or not or not we wish to be.