NEWS

Minnesota jury rules that pharmacist who denied woman morning after pill didn’t violate her rights

A jury in Minnesota dominated on Friday {that a} pharmacist didn’t commit discrimination when he didn’t fill an emergency contraception prescription for a lady after her prior contraceptive technique failed, in line with the gender advocacy group Gender Justice.

A jury in Aitkin County discovered {that a} pharmacist’s resolution to not present an emergency contraception prescription to plaintiff Andrea Anderson after citing his “beliefs” didn’t represent discrimination.

In response to courtroom paperwork, Anderson went to the one pharmacy situated in her city to retrieve a prescription of emergency contraception after one other technique failed, however the pharmacist there rejected her request.

The submitting additional claims that she would later must drive greater than 100 miles in whole to be able to get her morning after tablet after having a number of pharmacies reject her request.

Anderson was awarded $25,000 over emotional hurt brought on by the preliminary pharmacist who rejected to fill the prescription.

“I can’t assist however marvel concerning the different girls who could also be turned away,” Anderson stated in a press release. 

“What in the event that they settle for the pharmacist’s resolution and don’t notice that this habits is incorrect? What in the event that they don’t have any different alternative? Not everybody has the means or potential to drive a whole lot of miles to get a prescription crammed.”

The authorized director for Gender Justice, which is representing Anderson, stated it plans to enchantment the choice.

“To be clear, the regulation in Minnesota prohibits intercourse discrimination and that features refusing to fill prescriptions for emergency contraception,” Gender Justice Authorized Director Jess Braverman stated in a press release. “The jury was not deciding what the regulation is, they have been deciding the information of what occurred right here on this specific case.”

Source link

Related Articles

Back to top button
close